Rodan and Fields vs La Roche-Posay | What's Better?

written by: Tom Qiao
last update: February 20, 2024

As a skincare editor who has personally tried numerous moisturizers, I’m often asked how Rodan + Fields compares to drugstore favorites like La Roche-Posay. While both brands offer quality skincare, […]

As a skincare editor who has personally tried numerous moisturizers, I’m often asked how Rodan + Fields compares to drugstore favorites like La Roche-Posay. While both brands offer quality skincare, there are notable differences in ingredients, texture, cost, and suitability for different skin types. Here’s an insider’s take on how these two popular moisturizers stack up.

Ingredients

Rodan + Fields prides itself on specialized formulations powered by clinical-grade ingredients. For example, their Redefine regimen features peptides and retinol to combat wrinkles along with antioxidants like vitamin E. La Roche-Posay takes a streamlined, minimalist approach to ingredients. They rely heavily on thermal spring water paired with basic moisturizers like glycerin and nourishing shea butter. Due to their pared-down formula, La Roche-Posay products are less likely to irritate sensitive skin. However, for anti-aging benefits, Rodan + Fields packs more of a wrinkle-fighting punch.

Texture

I’d characterize the texture of Rodan + Fields moisturizers as luxuriously emollient, while La Roche-Posay’s absorb quickly with a lighter finish. The Redefine regimen feels almost like a silky serum as it glides over skin, providing a pampering sensory experience. By comparison, La Roche-Posay’s Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer has a thinner, slightly matte finish. So Rodan + Fields excels at moisturization and hydration, while La Roche-Posay gets points for wearability under makeup.

Cost

There’s no contest here. Rodan + Fields products cost significantly more. Their Redefine regimen has an eye-popping $220 price tag for a 60-day supply. Meanwhile, a La Roche-Posay moisturizer generally runs between $20-40. Now you might be thinking…is Rodan + Fields really 5 times better than a drugstore option? In my opinion, no. While their products are superior, the markup is disproportionate to the difference in quality. However, Rodan + Fields moisturizers could still make sense financially if they reduce your need for professional injectables or laser treatments.

Skin Type Suitability

In general, Rodan + Fields specializes in products for aging skin, while La Roche-Posay caters to sensitive skin. Anyone struggling with acne breakouts, rosacea, eczema, or dermatitis might tolerate La Roche-Posay better. Their products are specifically tested on reactive skin with promising results. Meanwhile, ingredients like retinol and acids from Rodan + Fields can further irritate delicate skin. However, if you’re primarily battling wrinkles and lack of firmness due to aging, then Rodan + Fields is the way to go.

In the end I’d characterize Rodan + Fields moisturizers as "best-in-class" while La Roche-Posay offers impressive quality for the price. Hopefully breaking down these key differences helps you pick the brand that's right for your individual skincare needs. Let me know if you have any other questions!

Article written by Tom Qiao

Related Posts

Subscribe.

Skin mysteries by email.
Subscribe - Post Sidebar

Join Our Email Newsletter.

Get the latest skincare science in your inbox.
Subscribe - Home, Pages, Posts

Related Posts

© 2024 YTQ Digital Inc.
Share via
Copy link